166
KING ARTHUR’S PLAGE IN PREHISTORY
Saxons was taken from the Kentish Chronicle (in Cantia); the stories of his family life and death were abstracted from the Life of St Germanus (a Sancto Germano); and the story of the fatherless boy and the magicians was an entirely separate unit, the Tale of Emrys (de Ambrosio). In an attempt to combine these different elements into an intelligible history,Nennius employed the technique known today as ‘cut and paste’ and, fortunately for us, preserved the identity of the pieces. Thus we havethe following sequence: (i) Kentish Chronicle, Part 1; (ii) Life of Saint Germanus, Part 1; (iii) Kentish Chronicle,Part 2; (iv) Life of Saint Germanus, Part 2; (v) Tale of Emrys; (vi) Kentish Chronicle, Part 3; (vii) Life of Saint Germanus, Part 3. How many Vortigerns were there and when did they live? Which were genuinehistorical characters and which fabulous? Nennius, writing more than four-and-a-half centuries after the arrival of the Saxons, worked on the assumption that there was only one Vortigern. Geoffreyof Monmouth,three centuries later again, saw no reason to disagreewith him. Gildas, writing much nearer the time,6 failed to mention Vortigern by name at all, just as he failed to mention Arthur. He did however refer to a ‘proud tyrant’ who, with his council, decided to
invite the Saxons over to combat his enemies in the north. The identity of this proud tyrant with Vortigern has been almost universally accepted. In essence, he is telling the same story as the Kentish Chronicle, though with a frustrating lack of the names of people and places. The identity of Vortigern presents us with two problems. Firstly, his name is not really a name at all but a title, meaning something like high chief. A twentieth-century example of such a title would be the German word Fuhrer, simply meaning leader, which Hitler transformed into something so terrible that even Vortigern looks positively tame by comparison. Secondly, with the Vortigern who brought in the Saxons,we reach the limit of any sort of continuous history that can be based on British sources alone. Nennius complained that ‘the scholars of the
island of Britain had no skill, and set down no record in books’,7 and, apart from oral tradition, Gildas, writing about An 540, is our earliest
source. I low much history would we know if we had no books and had to rely entirely on wh.it our parents and grandparents told us? We would know about the two World Wars and the British Empire and Queen
Vortigern:
Tyrant King 167
Victoria. We might have heard a story about Nelson putting a telescope to his blind eye, so that he could ignore a signalled order. We might have heard the bards reciting ‘Not a drum was heard, not a funeral note,
as his coruse to the ram part we hurried. ’ But the Napoleonic wars, to which these fragments of oral tradition relate, would have no real place in our know ledge of history. Oral tradition is a living art form and only
becomes relatively stable when it is eventually captured in written form . History, in any continuous form , would extend no more than a hundred years or so before our own time. Earlier traditions would have been progressively modified or lost. Return in to the time of Gildas, in the sixth century, real continuous history would have been restricted to the
troubles of the post-Roman period. The Roman occupation of Britain would have been a distant and hazy memory, associated with the decaying remains of the cities and towns, and anything earlier would have consisted of no more than disconnected legends and songs. Vortigern’s chief claim to a place in the history of the Wessex Stonehenge Ill-Hyperborean culture is the tradition , preserved by Geoffrey of Monmouth , of his involvem nt (on the losing side) in the disaster at the Cloister of Ambrius, which we have already considered in connection with the end of Stonehenge. While accepting that the Wessex Culture and the great age of Stonehenge together do no t am ount to a full-scale civilization, it was none the less instructive to consider a civilization model for their development. The same method may now be used to interpret the end of the
age. For a human death, the causes may be considered under three main headings: natural causes, murder, suicide. What we are discussing is the
cause of death of a culture. Burgess considered murder by invasion and, finding no evidence for any invasion, decided to settle for death by natural causes. For some reason, the possibility o f suicide was never m entioned, though Toynbee found evidence for this in the deaths of many civilizations. Toynbee traced the demise of civilizations to ‘times of troubles’,
which often preceded the ultimate end by many centuries. Thus InsHellenic civilization, which included the Koman Empire, had its time o f
troubles in the last four centuries he, starting with the outbreak oi the
Peloponnesian War in 431 iu The establishment oi tlu Koman Einpue
arrested the decay of the Hellenic civilization Ini srveial (cnturies, but KING ARTHUR’S PLACE IN PREHISTORY Saxons was taken from the Kentish Chronicle (in Cantia); the stories of his family life and death were abstracted from the Life of St Germanus (a Sancto Germano); and the story of the fatherless boy and the magicians was an entirely separate unit, the Tale of Emrys (de Ambrosio). In an attem pt to com bine these different elem ents into an intelligible history,
Nennius employed the technique known today as ‘cut and paste’ and, fortunately for us, preserved the identity o f the pieces. Thus we have
the follow ing sequence: (i) Kentish Chronicle, Part 1; (ii) Life o f Saint
G erm anus, P a rt 1; (iii) K entish Chronicle, P art 2; (iv) Life o f Saint
Germanus, Part 2; (v) Tale of Emrys; (vi) Kentish Chronicle, Part 3; (vii) Life
of Saint Germanus, Part 3.
H o w m any Vortigerns were there and w hen did they live? W hich
w ere genuine historical characters and w hich fabulous? N ennius, w riting m ore than four-and-a-half centuries after the arrival o f the Saxons,
w orked on the assum ption that there was only one V ortigern. Geoffrey
o f M o n m o u th , three centuries later again, saw no reason to disagree
w ith him . Gildas, w ritin g m uch nearer the tim e,6 failed to m ention
V ortigern by nam e at all, just as he failed to m ention A rthur. H e did
how ever refer to a ‘p ro u d ty ran t’ w ho, w ith his council, decided to
invite the Saxons over to com bat his enem ies in the north. T he identity o f this proud tyrant w ith V ortigern has been almost universally accepted.
In essence, he is telling the same story as the Kentish Chronicle, though
w ith a frustrating lack o f the names o f people and places. The identity of Vortigern presents us w ith tw o problem s. Firstly, his
name is not really a name at all but a title, meaning something like
high chief. A tw entieth-century example of such a title would be the German word Fuhrer, simply meaning leader, which Hitler transformed
into som ething so terrible that even V ortigern looks positively tame by
com parison. Secondly, w ith the V ortigern w ho brought in the Saxons,
we reach the limit of any sort of continuous history that can be based on British sources alone. Nennius complained that ‘the scholars of the
island of Britain had no skill, and set down no record in books , and, apart from oral tradition, Gildas, w riting about An 540, is our earliest source. How much history would we know if we had no books and had to rely entirely on wh.it our parents and grandparents told us? We would know about the two World Wars and the British Empire and Queen
72
GUIDE TO NORTH‘CORNWALL.
Camelford Road is the nearest station for Boscastle and
Tintagel.
Camelford.
Omnibus Service to Tintagel several times daily. Fare, 1/6. Also to Boscastle.
Fare, 1/6.
Hotels.— King’s Arms, Darlington, and several inns.
Special Coaching Excursion -see p. 73
The town of Camelford lies a mile and a half inland
from the station, on the banks of the Camel.
ON THE SUMMIT OF ROUGH TOR, CAMELFORD.
Camelford is an ancient town and closely associated with
the romance of King Arthur. At Slaughter Bridge, between
the station and the town, the armies of King Arthur and his
nephew, Mordred the Usurper, met. Mordred was killed,
and the king mortally wounded. Within recent years an
attempt has been made to promote the interests of Camel
ford as a holiday resort. Its attractions are : elevated
position, being seven hundred feet above sea-level; a line
bracing air coming from the sea on one side and from moor*
The archaeology of antimony mining: a resource assessment
In metallurgy, antimony was used in alloys for printer’s type, in the preparation of anti-friction metals
and for hardening lead. It was also used as an alloy, at from 5 to 10 per cent, with tin in the
production of Britannia metal. Antimony compounds were also used as a de-oxidiser and colourant in
glass, pottery, pigments and dyes. From an early period antimony compounds were also used in
cosmetics and for medicinal purposes, and, as such, can turn up in the archaeological record (Watson
2013, 21). A small number of mines in the 19th century and earlier, primarily in Cornwall, produced
antimony concentrates as a co-product and a few were promoted with antimony as their principal
product.
Geological background
The principal ore of antimony is the sulphide stibnite (Sb2S3) although the antimony-lead sulphosalt
(PB4FeSb6S14) has been worked in some mines.
The antimony at the Louisa Mine, in Dumfries and Galloway, is associated with stratiform
arsenopyrite-pyrite mineralisation in a Silurian greywacke sequence with similarities to that in the
Clontibret area, County Monaghan (Gallagher et al. 1983, 24). The latter is associated with gold, and
antimony has been associated with gold mineralisation in the vicinity of Port Isaac, Cornwall. Work by
Clayton and others (1990) links the antimony in that part of Cornwall to stratiform pre-granite
mineralisation and whilst there has been little or no investigation of antimony mineralisation in
south-east Cornwall it is probably of a similar origin (See Scrivener and Shepherd 1998 on stratiform
mineralisation in general in Cornwall). In Cumbria, to the north-east of Bassenthwaite, work by
Fortey and others (1984) again links the antimony to stratiform mineralisation similar to that in
Dumfries and Galloway.
Historical background
Very few mines in Britain produced antimony ores in significant quantities and they appear to have
been confined to Cornwall, Cumbria and parts of Scotland. Antimony mineral are reported elsewhere
but with no known record of production. In Cornwall, at Wheal Leigh near Pillaton to the north-west
of Saltash, antimony is said to have been worked from the late 16th century (Beer 1988, xxi). A mine
or mines in the Pillaton area reportedly produced 25 tons of ore in the 1770s and over 130 tons of ore
in the 1820s. Around Port Isaac in north Cornwall, and particularly in the parish of Endellion,
antimony was being worked by the mid-18th century with production levels from Wheal Boys in the
1770s of around 95 tons (De La Beche 1839, 615-16). Lysons’ (1814, 194-216, citing Pryce, Mineralogia
1
Cornub.) noted that a works for producing regulus of antimony was set up by a Mr. Reed at Feock,
close to Falmouth, and De La Beche (1839, 616) gives a date of 1778 for the works. A small number of
mines in both these areas of Cornwall continued to produce small amounts of antimony ore in the
second half of the 19th century (Burt et al 1987, xxxii). Small amounts of ore were also produced from
mines in Cumbria, to the north-east Bassenthwaite on the western edge of the Caldbeck Fells. These
were worked prior to 1816 (Lysons 1816, cxi) and again in the 1840s but information on the extent of
those workings is limited.
The best study of antimony mining and the processing of the ores in Britain comes from the south
west of Scotland and the working of the Louisa Mine at Glendining, in Dumfries and Galloway, and
the work there can inform that which should be carried out in England. The history of the Louisa
Mine, the antimony at which was first worked in 1793, was researched by McCracken (1965) at about
the same period that it was examined by Charles Daniel in connection with other work in the area.
Slag from the smelting process on site was analysed by Tylecote (1983), and the site was subsequently
surveyed and included in the RCAHMS publication on the historic landscape of eastern Dumfrieshire
(RCAHMS 1997, 276-77).
Technological background
The mining and ore preparation methods employed in working antimony ores were little different to
those used in the other hard rock non-ferrous metal mining sectors. Stibnite, the antimony sulphide,
had a specific gravity well below that of galena, the lead sulphide, with which it was commonly found
in mixed ore deposits and could therefore be easily separate by conventional methods. Jamesonite, the
antimony-lead sulphosalt, was a different matter with the lead and antimony in chemical combination,
where the antimony would be separated after smelting. Smelting of antimony ores to a metallic
regulus was a specialist liquation process, carried out on site at Glendining in the 1790s and described
in detail in the contemporary Statistical Account of Scotland (Sinclair 1791-99, II, 525-27). The process
was evidently also carried out on at least one mine in Cornwall, Pengenna, near Port Isaac, where ‘old
smelting works remain at Watergate, near the adit mouth, where much slag, rich in antimony, still
lies’ (Dewey 1920, 50). Processing was also carried out at Feock in Cornwall, albeit away from the
mining sites (Lysons 1814, 194-216) but little detail is available and the site of the process has not
been investigated.
Given that the presence of antimony could be a significant contaminant in lead, hardening it to the
extent that it was brittle and no longer malleable; many producers were at pains to remove it.
Softening hearths where antimony and other contaminants would be removed might be found at a
number of lead smelters and Gill (2001, 95-96) describes such a hearth at Old Gang, Swaledale,
confusingly known as the ‘Silver House’ although, as the process involved skimming contaminants
from the surface of lead maintained in a molten state, it may have been confused with the Pattinson
2
process for silver enrichment. There is, however, no evidence that the antimony was recovered as a
marketable product.
Infrastructure associated with antimony production
There is no evidence of any elements within the infrastructure of mining in England which specifically
supported the production of antimony. In Scotland, however, the settlement of Jamestown, in the
parish of Westerkirk, Dumfries and Galloway, was built by the company operating the Louisa Mine in
the 1790s along with an access road and bridges. The company also instituted a miners’ library in
Jamestown which still survives (McCracken 1965, 143-44 and Appendix).
Archaeological assessment
There has, as yet, been no archaeological investigation of antimony mines or the preparation and
smelting of antimony ores in England. The limited amount of investigation done at Glendining, in
Scotland, (RCAHMS 1997, 276-77) including analysis of the slag from the smelter carried out by
Tylecote (1983), with the benefit of a contemporary account of operations in the 1790s (Sinclair 1791
99, II, 525-27), could provide information relevant to the investigation of sites in England.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Dave Williams and Mike Gill.
References
Beer, K E 1988 The Metalliferous Mining Region of South-West England, addenda and corrigenda. Keyworth:
BGS
Clayton R E, Scrivener R C and Stanley C J 1990 ‘Mineralogical and preliminary fluid inclusion studies of lead
antimony mineralisation in north Cornwall’ Proceedings of the Ussher Society 7.3, 258-62
http://ussher.org.uk/journal/90s/1990/documents/Clayton_et_al_1990.pdf [accessed 16 April 2013]
De La Beche, H T 1839 Report on the Geology of Cornwall, Devon and West Somerset. London
Dewey, H 1920 Arsenic and Antimony Ores, Memoirs of the Geological Survey, Special Reports on the Mineral
Resources of Great Britain 15. London: HMSO
Fortey N J, Ingham J D, Skilton, B R H, Young, B and Shepherd T, J 1984 ‘Antimony mineralisation at Wet
Swine Gill’, Caldbeck Fells, Cumbria. Proc Yorkshire Geol Soc 45, 59-65
Gallagher, M J, Stone, P, Kemp, A E S, Hills, M G, Jones, R C, Smith, R T, Peachey, D Vickers, B P, Parker, M
E, Rollin, K E and Skilton, B R H 1983 Stratabound arsenic and vein antimony mineralisation in
3
Silurian greywackes at Glendinning, south Scotland. London: BGS Mineral Reconnaissance Programme
59 [PDF document] URL http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/11855/1/WFMR83059.pdf [accessed 16 April 2013]
Gill, M C 2001 Swaledale, its Mines and Smeltmills. Ashbourne: Landmark
Lysons, D and Lysons, S 1816 Magna Britannia: volume 4: Cumberland. London [Web documents]
http://www.british-history.ac.uk/source.aspx?pubid=404 [accessed 18 April 2013]
McCracken, A 1965 ‘The Glendining Antimony Mine (Louisa Mine)’, Trans Dumfrieshire and Galloway Nat Hist
and Antiq Soc, 3.42, 140-48
Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland (RCAHMS) 1997 Eastern Dumfrieshire:
an archaeological landscape. Edinburgh: HMSO
Scrivener, R C and Shepherd, T J 1998 ‘Mineralization’ in E B Se1wood, E M Durrance and C M Bristow (eds)
The Geology of Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly. 36-57. Exeter: UEP
Sinclair, J 1791-99 Statistical Account of Scotland. 21 vols, Edinburgh
Tylecote, R F 1983 ‘Scottish Antimony’ Proc Soc of Antiquaries of Scotland 113, 645-46
Watson, B 2013 ‘The Princess in the Police Station’, British Archaeology May-June 2013, 20-23
Heritage Category:
List Entry No :
Scheduling
1006633
County:
District: Cornwall
Parish:St. Winnow
Each official record of a scheduled monument contains
a map. New entries on the schedule from 1988 onwards
include a digitally created map which forms part of the
official record. For entries created in the years up to and
including 1987 a hand-drawn map forms part of the
official record. The map here has been translated from
the official map and that process may have introduced
inaccuracies. Copies of maps that form part of the
official record can be obtained from Historic England.
This map was delivered electronically and when printed
may not be to scale and may be subject to distortions.
All maps and grid references are for identification
purposes only and must be read in conjunction with
other information in the record.
Modern Ordnance Survey mapping: © Crown Copyright and database right 2018. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100024900.
Marine mapping: © British Crown and SeaZone Solutions Ltd 2018. All rights reserved. Product licence number 102006.006.„/^_
This is an A4 sized map and should be printed full size at A4 with no page scaling set.
Name: Wayside cross on Druid's Hill, 350m south east of Bodmin Lodge
List Entry NGR:SX 12655 61286
Map Scale:1:10000
Print Date:2 March 2024
Historic England
HistoricEngland.org.uk