In The Ancient Entrenchments and Camps of Gloucestershire, Edward J. Burrow mentions that probably either the Goidel or Brython people initially built Worlebury Camp.
The Belgae people subsequently overthrew the initial inhabitants and occupied the camp for a time, but they were finally destroyed at the hands of the Romans.
Worlebury Camp has been explored at various times over a period of 150 years. From 1851 to 1852, Charles Dymond, Edwin Martin Atkins, and Francis Warre excavated and surveyed Worlebury Camp.
Dymond returned in 1880 to continue the excavation, which lasted until 1881. Another century passed before the Woodspring Museum from Weston-
Finally, in 1998, the Avon Extensive Urban Study team performed the latest (as of 2008) assessment of the site.
Hill forts developed in the Late Bronze and Early Iron Age, roughly the start of the first millennium BC.
The reason for their emergence in Britain, and their purpose, has been a subject of debate.
It has been argued that they could have been military sites constructed in response to invasion from continental Europe, sites built by invaders, or a military reaction to social tensions caused by an increasing population and consequent pressure on agriculture.
The dominant view since the 1960s has been that the increasing use of iron led to social changes in Britain.
Deposits of iron ore were located in different places to the tin and copper ore necessary to make bronze, and as a result trading patterns shifted and the old elites lost their economic and social status.
Power passed into the hands of a new group of people.
Archaeologist Barry Cunliffe believes that population increase still played a role and has stated "[the forts] provided defensive possibilities for the community at those times when the stress [of an increasing population] burst out into open warfare.
But I wouldn't see them as having been built because there was a state of war. They would be functional as defensive strongholds when there were tensions and undoubtedly some of them were attacked and destroyed, but this was not the only, or even the most significant, factor in their construction".
Location
plan of the camp
The fort is located on the summit of Worlebury Hill, 109 metres (358 ft) above sea level.[12] It is in the present-
Weston-
Its occupants would have had a view of the countryside as well as any potential invaders. They would have been able to see out over to Sugar Loaf Mountain, the Black Mountains, the Mendip Hills, Dunkery Beacon, Sand Point, and Wales.[14] This view is no longer as unobstructed as it once was because there are so many trees spread over the hill.[15]
Triangular stone platforms
There are a number of triangular platforms on the slopes around the hill fort. The apexes of these triangles are flush with the hillside, with the base projecting in the downhill direction. However, the upper surface is approximately level.
The front faces of these platforms are about 1.7 metres (5.6 ft) above the hillside, and they have ditches in front of them to improve their defence. In a letter to Warre, Atkins theorised that the structures were slingers' platforms or archers' stations.
Several sling stones have been found around them, offering some credence to the theory that slingers stood upon these platforms.
Dymond mentions the stones in his book:
Several of them were broken, as though they had been used in the attack [on the fort], as, indeed, many of them probably were.
— Charles Dymond, Worlebury: An Ancient Stronghold in the County of Somerset Walls and ditches.
An artist's rendition of Worlebury Camp from a book published in 1886
Worlebury Hill is bordered on its north and west sides by steep cliffs dropping down into the Bristol Channel between Weston Bay and Sand Bay.
These would have rendered the fort nearly invulnerable to attack from those directions.
Nevertheless, the fort still has one wall on its north side and one on its west side, both very near the edge of the cliffs. On the south side, a single rampart and a ditch guarded the fort.
The level east side was protected by two stone ramparts and five ditches.
Parts of these ramparts were over 11 metres (35 ft) high measuring from the bottom of the ditch as of 1875.
The walls themselves are around 1 metre (3.3 ft) thick.
However, because they are dry-
To prevent access to the walls themselves, the inhabitants of the fort raised large breastworks around the base of the walls by piling up rock rubble against the bases.
These rubble barriers are over 1.22 metres (4.0 ft) high, and in places they are over 1.22 metres (4.0 ft) thick.
Attackers would have had to clear away the rubble before being able to attack the wall, and all the while they would be under direct fire from defenders on the top of the wall.
Archaeological findings
Storage pits
Storage pits
The area inside the outer wall has a series of hut circles and 93 storage pits cut directly into the bedrock, which is only around 60 centimetres (2.0 ft) beneath the surface of the soil in most places.
Eighteen of the Storage pits are in what Dymond calls the "keep", one is in the transverse fosse (a fosse is a ditch usually dug for protection, and seventy-
The inhabitants used them to store grain, as is evidenced by the kernels of barley and wheat and the shards of pots that were found in the pits. Several of the pits contained the remnants of peas and the remains of burned woven baskets. In addition, researchers also found sling stones and spindle whorls dated to the 1st or 2nd century BC in them.
A skull, found during Dymond's second exploration, which is gouged with many cuts from an edged weapon.
(Drawn in 1886 for Dymond's book, Worlebury:An Ancient Stronghold in the County of Somerset.)
Eighteen of these pits were found to contain the remains of human skeletons, which are now stored in the Weston-
Eighteen full skeletons were found, of which ten show evidence of a violent death (including sword cuts in the skulls).
It is possible that the Romans or the Belgic raiders attacked the fort and killed the inhabitants.
Artefacts
A cast copper alloy penannular collar of special interest to archaeologists has been found at the campsite. It may indicate that this hilltop site was used even before the Iron Age, since related artefacts tend to be found with Bronze Age items, and it was the first of its type found in Britain.
In 2006, a related copper penannular brooch dating to the 5th or 6th century AD was found in a spring between Brecon Beacons and the Black Mountains in Wales.
A gold penannular bracelet was found in the Perry River.
Roman coins have been found at Worlebury Camp since the Romans had established a presence by the end of the 1st century AD.
Many of the Roman coins bear the image of the Western Roman Emperor Honorius. This was inside the fort proper. Another coin was located by Trinity Path which leads towards the fort.
Other findings at the Worlebury campsite include animal remains, including the bones of pigs, oxen, horses, deer, goats, and even small birds. Limpet shells have also been found near the bones. Archaeologists found iron objects, adding further credibility to the idea that this fort is from the Iron Age. These objects include a chisel or borer, several spearheads and javelin heads, and an iron cone with charred wood inside and a rivet hole through the cone. Dymond assumes that this cone was once a plowshare. Stone artefacts, mainly slingstones and scrapers, have been discovered at the site. Just less than 36 flint chips have been found, of which some may be arrowheads. One good-
Damage to the site.
19th century quarry on the south side of the hill. Seen looking north from "South Road"
19th century
Development of Weston-
A quarry started operation in the southern side of Worlebury Hill in 1815 to mine for galena, calamine, and stone.
The Bristol and Exeter Railway arrived in Weston-
In 1842, Weston-
20th century
In the early 20th century, the Worlebury fort itself was damaged by boys rolling stones, including some from the walls of the fort, down the hill on which it stands.
The Axbridge District of the Somerset Archaeological Society was taking steps to prevent such damage from happening again.
Some of the trees planted in the early 19th century had become very large, and their roots were growing into the archaeological structures. In 2005, the Forestry Commission gave permission for North Somerset Council to fell 300 trees to reduce the subsequent risks.
A member of the North Somerset Council, Christopher Richards, said: "If we had a storm up here and these trees came down, then the entire hillfort could be destroyed."
| kings castle |